Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Walker Garfield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Walker Garfield

Jane Walker Garfield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Good and lovely person, I'm sure, but just not notable enough for encyclopaedia, bearing in mind also WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ANYBIO. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:GNG, per nom. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I did my due diligence and things are either passing mentions in small newspapers or obituary, etc. Also WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Missvain (talk) 18:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.