Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Marsh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 20:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Marsh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

IMBD shows a series of work on this actor, but a WP:BEFORE found not significant coverage. Fails WP:NACTOR , WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG . Sources provided are aimed at the play and Neil Simon and not Jamie Marsh. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC) Here is a recent article about Marsh and Lost in Yonkers and the whole Kevin Spacey mess. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9BD0:4FD0:ACED:3059:D601:EC14 (talk) 20:44, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marsh originated a role in the original Broadway production of Neil Simon's Pulitzer Prize and Tony award winning play Lost in Yonkers. This is a significant contribution to American Theater. It is the only play Neil Simon won a Pulitzer Prize for and is considered a classic American play. Wikipedia regards theater as important as other art forms. Had Marsh been on a significant TV show in such a capacity we wouldn't even be having this discussion. Why does the person trying to delete this article hold theater/Broadway in lower esteem than Television or Film? I do not understand why this article is being put up as consideration for deletion.

[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9BD0:4FD0:71AB:3585:348A:F86E (talk) 12:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[3]

[4][5]— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9BD0:4FD0:85A1:CC6:3D4A:79C2 (talk • contribs)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The single Broadway credit by itself might be enough to pass WP:NACTOR. But add to that his significant role in Brainscan, and that meets the first criteria of WP:NACTOR. Article definitely needs work to conform to MOS. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:56, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It doesnt pass significant coverage WP:SIGCOV which is one of the core criteria for meet notability. In additon, source provided are not "direct" support subject at all. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:48, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kirbanzo (talk) 15:07, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per originating role in Tony winner. Coverage "jamie+marsh"+actor here and "jamie+marsh"+actor here, among others. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - weak source - article fails WP:SIGCOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CASSIOPEIA (talk • contribs) 03:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.