Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamia Fatimatuzzahra Napa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jamia Fatimatuzzahra Napa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Educational establishment that fails WP:NSCHOOL. Only sources appear to be a facebook page. noq (talk) 15:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:46, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:57, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only citation is the Facebook page for the subject. This seems like a clear WP:SPAM and WP:PROMO violation, as often happens when small organizations want to exploit the encyclopedia to create online buzz. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a search doesn't reveal anything other than a Facebook page, so fails WP:GNG. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG, having only that FB page as a source. Also, looking at the FB timeline, they post things like screenshots of how they turn up in Google Search and links to this Wikipage. I agree that this seems to be an exploitation of Wikipedia as a billboard. --HyperGaruda (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.