Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Sidney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

James Sidney

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. The creator Janetteewen has attempted to start an AfD by moving the article to the Draft and Help namespaces and placing an AfD tag on the talk page, both of which are wrong. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Authors, Photography, Australia, and Canada. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No additional sources found on Google News/Books/Scholar; fails WP:NBIO. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 02:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Current page is completely unsourced; and even if the statements/claims made were sourced, they do not establish notability. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Cabrils (talk) 03:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 00:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Zero WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG Jacona (talk) 11:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.