Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Drought (theologian)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 05:02, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

James Drought (theologian)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to fail WP:NBASIC Headphase (talk) 04:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Headphase (talk) 04:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Headphase (talk) 04:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Headphase (talk) 04:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hard Keep He was a celtic researcher, was extremely influential in Ireland during his life. He was so important he is interred "in" the Abbey at Bath. I have found multiple sources. I will work on improvements.Super (talk) 05:24, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh that would be excellent, thanks for the input Supercopone. Apparently the Algorithms©™® were not in my favor- a brief search only yielded results for the American author. Some solid and specific references would be perfect. - Headphase (talk) 17:28, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- As Regius Professor of Divinity in the ancient university of Ireland, he certainly meets the criterion for keeping an WP:academic#5. "Regius" implies endowment by the king, probably as part of the foundation. The problem with the article is that it is a mere stub, not showing what his academic importance was, apart from holding the chair. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:50, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as passes WP:PROF with reliable book sources in the article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 02:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.