Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Drossner
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 14:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Jake Drossner
- Jake Drossner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BASEBALL/N. Doesn't meet WP:GNG with lack of significant coverage in multiple, independent sources; most coverage is from sources related to him, e.g. his schools, teams, leagues, etc. The only significant indy coverage I could find was on a single news event, his being drafted, which was covered by his hometown.Bucks County Courier Times buckslocalnews.com. However, WP:NOTNEWS. —Bagumba (talk) 18:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. —Bagumba (talk) 18:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The author's article creation history is also being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Proposed topic ban for User:Basketballfan12. You are also invited to comment there to help reach a consensus. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 20:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - not finding significant coverage, doesn't meet WP:BASEBALL/N. Rlendog (talk) 19:22, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 10:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 10:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.