Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaguar Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguar Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not show notoriety, WP:NCORP. Unverifiable sources. Guilherme Burn (talk) 16:58, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:02, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as no evidence of notability, Hasnt won any notable award,s Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"notable award,s Fails PORNBIO"!? Guilherme Burn (talk) 18:31, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copy & paste rationale - Just forgot to eliminate that part. –Davey2010^Talk 19:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Concur with nominator's assessment. Finnegas (talk) 11:05, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.