Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaclyn Hales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Disagreement exists mainly about whether the sourcing is sufficient to prove notability with roughly equal number of editors arguing for and against it. Since "significant coverage" is not a clear standard and no clear agreement exists whether the currently available coverage is significant, no consensus exists at this point. Regards SoWhy 11:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jaclyn Hales (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unremarkable actress Mjbmr (talk) 03:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Please see my comment at another AfD started by this user. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 04:10, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- WP:TOOSOON; does not meet WP:NACTOR & sig RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Power~enwiki (talk) 03:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  NOTE: for above vote no reasons given, not qualified. Mjbmr (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

• See my comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Roady. Mjbmr (talk) 09:03, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Sourced, notable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. a reasonable number of significant roles . DGG ( talk ) 00:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment most of her films are indie/student films and she was not a lead/main character in the films, except maybe Unicorn City (the one about the LARPing). Extinct (2017 TV series) sounds promising. She plays a main character there and it's BYUtv's second scripted television series. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:38, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:TOOSOON. No profiles, little media coverage beyond mentions in a handful of articles about the minor, indy movies she has appeared in, productions notable for their lack of notability. The sole source for the bio section is PRIMARY, apparently because there has been no media coverage of her career. At least, none that I can find although she has a unique name.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a Women of Upstate New York magazine article [1] that covers her career. So that's promising, but yeah, only two lead roles in two projects, only the latter of the projects is Wikipedia-notable. If someone really wants her article to stay around, they need to work on it in a draft. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment this is a person currently active in the entertainment industry. It may be WP:TOOSOON because the show Extinct doesn't appear to be on the air yet, but the benefit of the doubt should be to keep the article. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.