Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Sleper (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:27, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jackie Sleper

Jackie Sleper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of notable galleries or museums. A Google search does not bring up any secondary sources showing birth, education, or career. This is the second request for deletion for this page. The result in 2009 was delete Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Sleper, but it looks like it was never actually deleted recreated within days. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:05, 15 October 2021 (UTC) (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:05, 15 October 2021 (UTC) (UTC) [reply]

Delete I looked for sources and found one article in Sculpture, which is now cited, but found very little else. The artist's own bio give no indication that she meets any of the criteria in our notability guide for artists WP:NARTIST (which, by the way, could do with a rewrite) Vexations (talk) 12:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I looked around, and basically all the sources I saw were closely related to press release churn. --- Possibly ☎ 02:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Effectively unsourced. I'm not here to accept articles that try and take the mick. scope_creep^Talk 14:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.