Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Hollywood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jackie Hollywood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Hitro talk 06:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 06:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 06:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 06:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hitro talk 06:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello! I wanted to say that my article Jackie Hollywood is being reviewed for possible deletion.

I am very new to this and I have tried to create the article for this girl Jackie Hollywood youtuber / rapper (in principle) as best as possible, I have used the biographical structure that Wikipedia normally gives to singers of any style musical.

I think that the girl already has a certain relevance, in fact when you look for her you already get enough images of her on Google, in addition to the fact that Google's own algorithm already gives us the musical genre that "Hip-hop / Rap" does so which evidently gives us clues that she is a rapper singer.

The article created has several good references "in my opinion", but some are from YouTube and Instagram, we must not forget that she is also a youtuber, and besides being a radio interviewer and is dedicated to the world of modeling, the greatest fame he has been getting it now in recent years, given his songs on the channel.

The rest of the sources speak of her biography, origin, childhood, career, studies, career in radio and music ...

And I also have this page that I did not have in the article but I just added, since I would say that it is also good, since it indicates that she has been a model. https://www.modelmayhem.com/JackieHollywood111

Then "as a curiosity" I have seen that the guitarist of Escape The Fate T. J. Bell has Wikipedia, with his information and such, but he does not have a single source in the article that can credit it "unless I see" TJ Bell is not too famous "in my opinion" although I really like him as the current guitarist of the band. Also, I just realized that he does not have Wikipedia in English, being American, and in Spanish it turns out that he does, curious.

I'm not saying Jackie Hollywood should have and T. J. Bell shouldn't. I just find it funny that Jackie with more sources and possibly more famous since TJ, it costs so much to give the approval and with TJ "it seems" that there was no problem.

I hope you read me and respond, greetings :) Paul Polimero (talk) 10:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. @Paul Polimero the page T. J. Bell is about a NASCAR driver, not a guitarist: looking at Escape the Fate's page, their guitarist doesn't appear to have his own article on English Wikipedia: if you feel that his page at Spanish Wikipedia should be nominated for deletion, you need to nominate it there. In any case, your argument is invalid, as the guidance at WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS makes clear. Jackie Hollywood's page is sourced to her own YouTube pages, some interviews, and promotional websites, none of which can be considered as reliable sources. As set out by the criteria listed at WP:NMODEL and WP:NMUSICIAN, she simply hasn't achieved the notability required to have her own Wikipedia page. I vote Delete. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:07, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I found one source Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 20:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per Dom Kaos. There's practically nothing in the article in terms of reliable sourcing. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Celebrity reporter at a radio station isn't notable enough. Heck I'm a youtuber, that isn't notable. Oaktree b (talk) 20:18, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Some coverage available, but very early days. Perhaps a couple of years up the road. WP:TOOSOON. scope_creep^Talk 16:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.