Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Gore (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 16:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Gore (actor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Weak BLP, but other non-notability persons for young actors, both unclear and insufficient. Ni3Xposite (talk) 12:57, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ni3Xposite (talk) 12:57, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:54, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:NACTOR: series regular/main role in The Michael J. Fox Show and The Kids Are Alright, main role in the We Are What We Are and recurring role in Billions—all of which appear to be notable productions—plus several other TV and film roles. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:09, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: There is a strong case for meeting WP:NACTOR. Sources within the body of the article are good enough.Watchbotx (talk) 07:57, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:43, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Individual appears to have SIGCOV, such as this, not to mention a razor-thin NACTOR claim. PK650 (talk) 04:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.