Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabot Cosmetics (The Young and the Restless)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Young and the Restless. Seems the general consensus is that the topic is not notable enough for its own article. Although there's no distinct consensus to merge it, this seems like a reasonable outcome given the circumstances –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jabot Cosmetics (The Young and the Restless)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable. Hmm, WP:CORP does not specifically mention fictional companies. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Wikipedia alone has 51 references to this company already, it must be quite important in the series. On the other stuff exists argument there is also Newman Enterprises. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment--WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is an essay explaining why the "other stuff exists argument" isn't a valid keep argument. Also, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newman Enterprises.--Blargh29 (talk) 13:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Please note that Newman Enterprises, the article that you use as evidence of this article's notability, has been deleted via AFD.--Blargh29 (talk) 06:18, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- We cannot use WP as a ref. We have to rely on stuf outside WP to establish notability. WP probably has a systemic bias towards popular culture. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails the general notability guideline. Nothing worthy of a merge. --Blargh29 (talk) 13:07, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's already a redirect for this subject: Jabot Cosmetics. Rocksey (talk) 18:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into a new section at The Young and the Restless. Absolutely no outside sources, does not meet WP:GNG, no rationale for its own page. J04n(talk page) 03:50, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have added some outside sources. There is also merchandise available featuring this company's logo (clothes, bags mugs). (but link hits spam filter) I also added in two iw links for nl and ro. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:57, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pmlineditor ∞ 09:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with The Young and the Restless. Minimal reference value, and no external sources. Racepacket (talk) 18:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.