Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J Michael Cole

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 20:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

J Michael Cole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:JOURNALIST. References 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10 are all self-written. In the only 2 independent sources, Ref 5 and 7, He's only mentioned in "works cited". There seems to be some WP:ADVOCACY going on by the page creator, because his other recent articles Brian Hioe (also on AFD) and Michael Turton (also on AFD) are also political bloggers on Taiwan with a certain sociopolitical leaning, and along with this article serve as each other's references and incoming links. Timmyshin (talk) 01:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 03:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 03:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete another in a walled garden of articles on non-notable media figures in Taiwan.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:15, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per lack of apparent notability, despite over abundance of references, and walled-garden concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete I don't see any articles about him, just profiles of him as contributor to various publications. Smmurphy(Talk) 15:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. This article appears to be self-promotion more than anything else. South Nashua (talk) 15:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.