Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J -Curve

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. I won't protest if anybody places a redirect here, but how useful would it really be to have one when the hyphen follows a space? Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

J -Curve

This is original research. See N-Curve (AfD discussion) and Pinowski Curve (AfD discussion). Uncle G 19:04, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. — ceejayoz ^talk 19:18, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipedia:No original research. --Vsion 21:27, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, just like the other two. — Haeleth Talk 22:47, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete original research. -- Malo 00:22, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This article is worthy of deletion under WP:NOR. However, it should be a redirect to our article on the J curve , I recall Paul Keating then Australian Treasurer, talking about the J-curve in the 1980's in relation to the Australian trade deficit. A Google J Curve search for "J curve" trade comes up with 38,000 results so that is probably the topic people would be looking for see [1]. BTW our J curve article is in pretty poor shape. Capitalistroadster 01:09, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Bear in mind that this article's title is J -Curve, not J-Curve. Uncle G 02:49, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as per Capitalistroadster. MCB 02:30, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The exponential curve is not a new discovery. Plus you can't have unbounded exponential growth within a bounded range - even if you could quantify degrees of success in a relationship, you'd probably get an S-curve. Peter Grey 07:24, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unverifiable OR. Also, named wrong (note extra space after "J") --A D Monroe III 01:28, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.