Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JLS (JLS album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to JLS (band). \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 23:16, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JLS (JLS album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of deleted page

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are orphaned pages of the original pages:

Speedy delete all - recreation. The album is still not notable. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 16:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge Released by a notable band on a notable label; I'm sure there're sources somewhere. If there isn't that much to say about it, merge/redirect to artist per WP:NALBUMS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It's coming out on 9 November 2009, they're a notable band (especially considering they've had 2 No1s), it's got a tracklisting, etc etc. Merge the other two (JLS (JLS album) and JLS (debut-album)) to JLS (album). (PS - If the official JLS website isn't a permitted source for the information, what is?) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 22:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's permitted as a source, but it doesn't contribute to notability. snigbrook (talk) 20:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the band's page unless article is expanded - WP:NALBUM indicates that generally any album of a notable band will be itself notable enough for a page. The exception is when the album article consists of little more than a track listing (as the article at this stage is). So merge, unless someone can add more detail than just track names. - DustFormsWords (talk) 22:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There is not significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 10:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Although it is likely (but not certain) to be notable when it is released, notability shouldn't be predicted, and inherited notability isn't valid. At present it looks like there is not enough coverage from independent sources, so it should be redirected (per notability of albums guideline) until more sources are available. snigbrook (talk) 20:35, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge per WP:NALBUMS. The band may be notable, but there's no assertion that their unreleased album will be. WP:CRYSTAL-cruft - deleting it may help creators and potential future creators obtain clue. Cheers, TFOWR^{This flag once was red} 16:57, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.