Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J'Dillian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

J'Dillian

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, as all but the first source are related to the subject either being him, his music, an interview or an organisation that he heads, considers unreliable or predatory, and the first not mentioning him. A PROD was contested. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 00:39, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and United States of America. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 00:39, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment an earlier version by the same editor was moved to draft on 15 December; I have since redirected it to here. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:43, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom as promotional, and not clear what the GNG sources are. I don't see where he meets WP:MUSICBIO. Don't see any referencs in external newspapers. The section of name drops for musical influences is original research / COI. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 01:00, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Modern renaissance man eh? Nothing found for GNG streaming sites and such. Very promotional, very much. Oaktree b (talk) 03:24, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, aside from being WP:UPE or WP:COI editing, fails WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An overwhelmingly obvious attempt at self-promotion and to spread his resume, perhaps in good faith but unaware of how Wikipedia works. This site is not LinkedIn. As an academic myself, I congratulate him for being published in some professional journals, but that does not count for notability here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:07, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.