Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izabela Kisio-Skorupa

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After two relists, too little participation to establish a deletion consensus for an article that is not eligible for soft deletion. RL0919 (talk) 03:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Izabela Kisio-Skorupa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This woman does not have any causes of encyclopedism. Sources provided in this article describe only vagueness and non-important facts and information. That person is only a small polish influencer who isn't known besides the circle of her fans. She is not all-polish-known celebrity. She's running only yt channel and not so big Instagram profile. She's most recognisable due to the fact of having a daughter actress who additionally isn't so much recognized polish actress. In Polish wikipedia article about her was repeatedly deleted and she comes back over and over again due to trolls, probably psycho fans who wants her to be visible in wikipedia. However, they don't have any rational argument proving her encyklopedysm. The Wolak (talk) 08:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Deletion contested on the talk page, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as the one argument made is on policy - relisting for further policy discussion from other editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MaxnaCarter (talk) 01:58, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.