Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Itch (EP)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Radiohead discography#Extended plays. Go Phightins! 16:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Itch (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSIC. I can find no significant independent coverage of this EP or other indication of notability (which is not unexpected given its very limited release). Article cites no sources other than its AllMusic entry (which gives a rating but no review) and consists competely of original research. I suggest redirecting to Radiohead discography#Extended plays. Lennart97 (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Radiohead discography#Extended play per nom--fails WP:GNG. Not enough material for a reasonably detailed article. (talk) 08:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edited to add: another option may be to merge the content into a notable release, similar to how the EP No Surprises/Running from Demons is covered at No Surprises. As Itch contains only music from Pablo Honey, that could be a target for merging. There isn't any sourced content to merge, however, apart from the tracklist. Lennart97 (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Radiohead discography#Extended play fails WP:NALBUMS, lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources. --Ashleyyoursmile! 12:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.