Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isuobiangwu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:32, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isuobiangwu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did a search and it does not seem to be notable Chidgk1 (talk) 19:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator thanks for improving Chidgk1 (talk) 13:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per WP:NPLACE, populated and legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable. This is, from Googling, a populated designated village and meets the requirements. Nomader (talk) 20:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Legally recognized? Perhaps someone who knows more about Nigeria than I do can comment whether it is notable due to the cargo airport. Isn’t it part of the city rather than a village? Chidgk1 (talk) 14:57, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Further searches seem to make the case that WP:COMMONNAME here might just be Obiangwu, and that "Isu" refers to Isu, Nigeria? Could really use someone who's actually familiar with the local geography and political geographic rules here. Sources are much more common for it (and a google maps search shows that both overlap according to their GIS, although take those particular results with a grain of salt). Either way, this !vote still stands per WP:NPLACE. [1] Nomader (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing to show this place meets WP:GEOLAND.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:50, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Look again... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:53, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Keep Non-notable superstub, nothing to prove importance. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Changed opinion per improvements of article. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GEOLAND points this to GNG, and this fails GNG. Sources found include database records, and routine (although horrible) news stories. I couldn't identify a good redirect target, but no objection if consensus emerges. // Timothy :: talk 14:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obiangwu is more common and it's a legally recognized place with churches and schools. In Nigerian national news currently with a shooting incident at the market. QuicoleJR and TimothyBlue you might want to reconsider..♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If the article survives this AfD, it would be eligible for DYK. Just some food for thought. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator thanks for improving Chidgk1 (talk) 13:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.