Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Astill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone who contributed to the discussion. If you are not happy with the decision, please bring it up here. Missvain (talk) 15:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Astill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - This page about me was set up years ago by friends and has become a source of embarrassment. I agree that I am not adequately notable as according to WP:GNG. I would like this page to be deleted.
Delete - Not yet notable. relatively minor award for "Young environmentalist of the year." DGG ( talk ) 21:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Too soon. The one article was respectable coverage, but the rest falls short. There just isn't enough independent coverage to get him past WP:GNG yet. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 22:34, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 03:09, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per above comments. This person doesn't establish enough notability per WP:GNG with the information provided, as well as with any sources I could find that were secondary and reliable per WP:SOURCE. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:57, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - entirely local coverage, WP:UPANDCOMING. Bearian (talk) 20:41, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 21:25, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.