Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Adni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Adni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. A single mention in a online column does not prove notability. All the other references are self-published or promotional. ubiquity (talk) 19:01, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 19:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 19:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit Conflict) Delete as I reviewed this in December and would've PRODed sooner even, but I was uninterested in having it boldly removed. There's still nothing at all actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 19:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Tepid delete. Most of the coverage I saw was in tabloids like Metro, which is useless, but I did find this article. I'm not familiar with UPROXX the other one I could find, although its WIki page does say it has editorial oversight, and isn't just a blog. If there were a few more reviews of his single, I'd change my vote to keep. Yvarta (talk) 20:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable musician. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 19:07, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing at all actually convincing for his own notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:51, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete charitably, it is much WP:TOOSOON. he posts on youtube. lacks RS .E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.