Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irving Braxiatel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Doctor Who supporting characters. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:42, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Irving Braxiatel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While a highly recurring and notable character in Doctor Who spin-off media, I quite literally could not locate any sources that were more than a trivial mention. The article already cites no sources to begin with. While the article has potential to be kept if sources turn up now or in the future, I don't believe anything exists right now. As it stands, article doesn't meet SIGCOV. A redirect to the Doctor Who supporting characters list seems good for now, though I'm wary of redirecting it there given the current state of that article. Pokelego999 (talk) 19:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Literature. Pokelego999 (talk) 19:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no sources for notability. I have no opinion on whether a redirect would be appropriate. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to List of Doctor Who supporting characters is the best target I can think of; he’s one of the best-known spinoff characters so I don’t think hard delete is appropriate Dronebogus (talk) 12:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/redirect to List of Doctor Who supporting characters. Only WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs of this character in reliable sources. Does not pass WP:SIGCOV. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.