Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iranian Psychological Association of America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:41, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian Psychological Association of America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

no reliable secondary sources Bali ultimate (talk) 22:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Eligible for speedy? Obviously they think Wikipedia is just a promotional tool. Weirdly, there was an Iranian Library Association or some such also just put up for deletion. Fletcher (talk) 23:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• comment yes, the library one was started by the same SPA. In both this instance and the library instance, the same user removed the speedy tag (in both cases placed there by someone other than me). I'm all for speedy, but am not really an experienced editor when it comes to these more administrative issues. If someone else wants to deep six it poste-haste, i would be delighted, but won't do it myself.Bali ultimate (talk) 00:42, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I was the one who tagged it for speedy deletion under WP:G11. I agree that, my tag having been removed, AfD is the best means to its deletion. It still contains "our community" first-person language typical of blatant self-promotion.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:51, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This is a well-known association based in Los Angeles. There is no commercial advertising in this article, but informational. As a non-profit NGO they are affiliated with APA and are providing continued education credit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.251.28.27 (talk) 16:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• comment the above commenter, who has never edited wikipedia before (first contribution) provides no evidence that would prove it's a notable org I urge the commenter to read WP:CORPBali ultimate (talk) 16:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.