Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqbal Jogi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bibliomaniac15 03:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iqbal Jogi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So this article was deleted back in 2018 and it seems it has been re-created with the same material.

The subject does not appear to meet GNG.. he has got some trivial coverage from independent reliable sources such as here and here but nothing significant..... I tried WP:BEFORE this nomination, but was unsuccessful, unfortunately. Saqib (talk) 15:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Little has changed since thee first AfD in 2018. In that older discussion, note that some editors searched for information about this musician in the relevant local languages but found little beyond what could be found in English. The musician has a few magazine mentions (see the source already at footnotes 1 and 4 in the article), and I also found a few mentions in sources that cater to collectors of obscure exotica (e.g. [1]), but unfortunately the musician remains a topic for specialist collectors and there is not enough significant and reliable coverage. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not enough here to meet our criteria for inclusion. Wm335td (talk) 16:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.