Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iplist
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Iplist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is about IP blocking software with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. There are no sources in the article, nor could I find coverage in my searches. Whpq (talk) 11:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep-The topic is notable. The external links are suficient for this kind of article.--Goldenaster (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2013 (UTC) — Goldenaster (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Reply - The external links consist of one unreliable source and two primary sources. I fail to see how this is "sufficient". -- Whpq (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Golenaster (talk · contribs) has made 12 edits, 10 of them are on AfDs !voting keep. Dougweller (talk) 15:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply - The external links consist of one unreliable source and two primary sources. I fail to see how this is "sufficient". -- Whpq (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can't see notability, if Goldenaster really thinks a link to a forum trying to raise money to stay online then he needs to read our guidelines. But I see no evidence of that. Dougweller (talk) 15:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom, no reliable sources to establish notability of this software. Current links are not sufficient. Dialectric (talk) 09:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.