Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ipdb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, the main argument being WP:TOOSOON

Ipdb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A dismally sourced article on an under-the-radar site. A Google search fails to turn up any significant coverage of this site, which appears to fall short of WP:WEB and WP:CORP requirements. And Adoil Descended (talk) 01:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 22:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – WP:TOOSOON. The site only launched in November. It's still way too early to have garnered significant coverage, and still much smaller by number of podcasts than major index sites like iTunes and Stitcher Radio. Delete for now with no prejudice against creating again if it develops into well-covered site. – Margin1522 (talk) 05:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.