Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IoFTPD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @233 · 04:35, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IoFTPD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: not notable, no reliable sources found to improve article. Mattg82 (talk) 02:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom: non-notable, no references, unable to find any reviews or anything that would help to assert notability. --GreyCat (talk) 20:17, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sources, no article. Miami33139 (talk) 01:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This source and the pseudonymous name of the creator make me think this server is used mostly in the warez scene and similar (probably on compromised boxes too) for certain reasons: it runs on win32 boxes, ability to handle high load, and no GUI indicated there. If more reliable sources write about, it could be recreated. Pcap ping 15:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like I was right. Pcap ping 15:36, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.