Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invinsible

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Skylar Grey. When there is no new information present, the article can be restored as a stand alone. (non-admin closure) —cyberpower ^Chat_{Limited Access} 15:28, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invinsible

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is lacking in depth that warrants an individual page per WP:NMUSIC. Unfortunately the album has no confirmed release date, nor does it have a confirmed completion. The subject has been quiet in nearly a full year and actually when looking at the sourcing there's few sources: one youtube video, an LA times article and a press release - the latter of which is not really an independent source. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:18, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I considered suggesting to temporarily incubate and merge/redirect, but there is a really significant amount of ongoing coverage available, dating from one year ago, and with that level of expectation together with the question of when it will be released (if ever; this interview is the latest I could find about it. The short answer: no date yet), I think that the reader is better served by the article as it stands now than by a simple mention at the parent article — Frankie (talk) 17:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 03:20, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Skylar Grey. There is potential to beef up the article with sources like these [1][2][3][4][5], but over the past couple months there does not appear to be new information on this upcoming release. This info might best belong in the artist's main article for now, at least until the track listing and release date are confirmed. Gongshow ^Talk 08:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Skylar Grey. I agree with Gongshow that this material best belongs in the artist's article until we have a release date and a track listing. We can always split it back out again when it looks a little bit more like an actual album and a little bit less like speculation. And it's not as if the artist article is particularly long, so I don't think space will be an issue. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 11:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.