Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intrepid (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Intrepid (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:NFSOURCES; the Radio Times link is a capsule review and capsule reviews are "insufficient to fully establish notability" per NFSOURCES. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 00:55, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I couldn't find anything to establish notability either. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 16:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I found a few examples of coverage, although they weren't plentiful or in-depth: [1], [2], [3]. It's quite possible that more coverage exists from the time of its release. --Michig (talk) 21:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above mentioned coverage. Seems enough to pass WP:GNG Donaldd23 (talk) 13:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.