Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interstate 8 (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. KTC (talk) 00:06, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 8 (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musical release. No evidence of charting. No evidence of awards. No evidence of full-length professional reviews. PROD removed without improvement. Redirect reverted without improvement. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:19, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Modest Mouse discography#EPs - Google News archives provided reviews here, here and here (brief review). These three were probably the best from all the results, several of them are minor mentions. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — sparklism ^hey! 09:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Allmusic has a professional, in-depth review here, while Sputnikmusic also has a review (but this is just a user review, so non-reliable). I think with the coverage found by SwisterTwister we probably have just about enough to scrape the bar at WP:NALBUMS. — sparklism ^hey! 09:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Sparklism. Weak notability exists, does not warrant a deletion under GNG. -T.I.M^(Contact) 00:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. The Allmusic and Eugene Register-Guard reviews are just enough to meet WP:NALBUMS. Gong show 18:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and redirect to discography/artists page per WP:NALBUMS although there is a critics reveiw (one reliable one, one user one), this is not enough information to produce an article that has subsequently more information than just a track listing. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 15:51, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This can be expanded using the reviews that exist, and there will then be more content than can sensisbly be merged to the band or discography article. --Michig (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.