Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interstate 164

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 164

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is completely out of date, I-164 was merged with I-69 over a year ago (except for a small stretch of half a mile), useful information has been merged with the I-69 article. The only reason i don't just delete it myself is that there is an open Move request for the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{InsertTalkHere} 21:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep—this article is also the subject of a possible merger, and any redirect with full page history would be needed for attribution purposes. In short, deletion is the wrong option here. Imzadi 1979 → 22:13, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Submission Withdrawn: fair enough, User:Imzadi1979 is right, I was too hasty. It will be needed as a redirect. InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{InsertTalkHere} 22:34, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.