Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet humor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 10:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Internet humor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

How do we know what to include? Plus, I do not believe it is possible to find Reliable coverage on this topic. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep There are plenty of sources, but although some are from news websites, I'm not sure how reliable they are. I'm leaning "Keep" for now, but I could change my mind. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 23:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – WP:GNG pass. Below are some book, scholarly journal and news sources. Many of these sources were found using links in the Find sources template atop this nomination page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.