Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International versions of Family Feud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

International versions of Family Feud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:LISTCRUFT/WP:LINKFARM article of international versions of Family Feud. All versions that meet WP:N have their own article, and details for those without an individual article do not meet WP:V. WP:NOT 2.6 (not a directory) and 2.10 (not an indiscriminate collection of information). AldezD (talk) 02:52, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, rename to "List of...", and remove the versions without articles. Doesn't really fit anything above: doesn't really fit listcruft IMO, not a link farm as it's a list, definitely not indiscriminate, nor does it fit within the definition of "directory" that is discouraged. Ansh6 6 6 07:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This information would naturally belong on the main article Family Feud, but space reasons say breaking it out into a separate article is legitimate. Additionally, many of the entries are notable, and therefore it qualifies as a list of notable things that have a strong connection. I hardly see how this is indiscriminate, and it's relevant for discussing Family Feud as a format. Additionally, a show not having an article does not mean it fails WP:V - there is likely to be some information confirming the existence of each of these TV series even if they don't have in-depth critical comment. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A reasonable WP:SPINOUT of Family Feud that also meets WP:LISTPURP. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:51, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.