Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interlude(Book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:37, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interlude(Book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

completely non-notable work of fiction. Ironholds (talk) 19:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Cptmurdok (talk) 20:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Completely non-notable book. At first I thought it might be a hoax, but I did find a few Google hits in non-notable sources so it probably does exist, possibly in unpublished form. No publisher is identified, either in the article or in the Google references. Nothing on Amazon or other book-sales sites. The situation is best summed up here at weread.com, where the author biography consists of "I'm a kid who just wrote a book." Good luck to this kid, but his work has to become a lot more WP:N notable - and a lot more REAL - before it can be included in Wikipedia. --MelanieN (talk) 14:46, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.