Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InterMapper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn and no !votes for delete. (NAC) Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 14:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

InterMapper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Empty, referenceless, sourceless page with no information or value of any kind and three external links that all go back to the product's site.~~ Lahnfeear (talk) 13:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there is no indication of notability. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 18:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Intermapper is one of the grand old daddies of SNMP monitors, in full disclosure I've used this since version 1, which is a very long time. I've added some references which I believe are sufficient to establish notability, and flagged it for rescue. There are a number of good sources, but one must wade through a good number of press releases and passing mentions to find them. The article has been expanded a bit, but very roughly (but AFD is not cleanup). --Nuujinn (talk) 22:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep click the Google news search at the top of the AFD. 100 results. The ones from MacWorld and others seem notable. Dream Focus 08:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AFD Withdrawn by nom based on edits Lahnfeear (talk) 12:52, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.