Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated Defence Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Integrated Defence Systems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self sourced with no in-depth coverage to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 16:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 11:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 11:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 11:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 11:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not verifiable. All of the references are to their (currently non-functional) website; all I can find are telephone-book style directory listings. (and unrelated things such as [1]) The name is so generic I'm not certain what this refers to. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree, seems to fail WP:PROMOTION, etc. As the nominator points out, I don't see more coverage elsewhere. Smmurphy^(Talk) 19:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Totally unverifiable --Molestash (talk) 13:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very hard to find much of anything in a BEFORE (doesn't help their name is used much more notable companies and uses) - Searches with "Integrated Defence Systems"+Pakistan+<product name> didn't yield much of anything. Domain name is dead. Article itself doesn't assert notability - per the (somewhat WP:V article in that it was possible to verify some of these products were produced by IDS as some point) - the company produced a very small UAV, a cluster munition (in anti-armor and anti-personnel versions), flares, and batteries - which would make this a pretty small aerospace producer - which generally would not be notable.Icewhiz (talk) 13:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Kierzek (talk) 17:58, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.