Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instituto de Desenvolvimento Gerencial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Instituto de Desenvolvimento Gerencial

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable organisation. Can't find much in the way of reliable sources besides mentions, but I could be missing something due to the language barrier. Company has since changed its name to Falconi Consultores de Resultados, for which I also didn't find much in the way of sourcing. Sam Walton (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sam Walton (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Sam Walton (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. With help of my knowledge in spanish, I found that this company has been superseded by "Falconi Consultores de Resultado" as stated in its portuguese article [1]. Even so, both companies do not have solid coverage to establish notability. Does not seem to meet NCORP or GNG. Nevertheless, one of the founders, Vicente Falconi, does seem to be notable (portuguese [2]), so if anyone cares enough to create an article on him and merge content from the institute there, I would vote for it. I will not volunteer, though. Mathias (talk) 03:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:58, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 13:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.