Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovecs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draft. Per request of the author Spartaz ^Humbug! 00:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Innovecs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:NCORP. A WP:BEFORE search turns up press releases but no significant coverage online per WP:CORPDEPTH, only passing mentions in reliable sources. Captain Calm (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Captain Calm (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Captain Calm (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Captain Calm (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi,I'm just starting to create an article, I'm looking for reliable sources--OmInna (talk) 16:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• I agree the page lacks reliable sources and fails to meet DEPTHCOV so please remove to the Draft if it's possible.--OmInna (talk) 12:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify as the article is too weak. I cannot find any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails NCORP/GNG. The author agrees with that too. --Mulage9 (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. None of the English language sources are significant, reliable, and independent. The foreign language sources do not appear to be any better, although that impression is admittedly based on machine translation of those sources. Small company going about its regular business and no evidence of meeting notability requirements. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.