Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Injinji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirects can be created at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Injinji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most coverage in RS are press releases and primary sources. PROD also removed by page's creator. Meatsgains (talk) 16:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly a vanity page. Sources that I see are PR or PR-like, not meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete bordering on advertising. Almost all sources provided are its own website. Fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 10:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, it exists. And that's the most important fact that can be said about it. No indication of notability, borderline A7 speedy case. Huon (talk) 22:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and although this would have been acceptable speedy material, removing the PROD and AfD templates suggest this may likely be restarted later, thus we have G4 now. SwisterTwister talk 22:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Toe socks. Injinji is the leading manufacturer of toe socks for serious athletic use. Although there are independent sources available, they do not provide enough detailed coverage of the company to justify a separate article at this time. Disclosure: I am a hiker and climber, and use this company's products. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.