Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingleses do Rio Vermelho
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ingleses do Rio Vermelho
- Ingleses do Rio Vermelho (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Was speedy-delete-tagged and tagged by User:CorenSearchBot as copyvio of http://www.i2ts.org/I2TS2005/index.php?page=city , but its author says not: see Talk:Ingleses do Rio Vermelho. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I did some translation from the Portuguese WP article which seems well developed and not a copyright violation, unless we're not allowed to copy from other WP articles. --Oakshade (talk) 19:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep topic seems notable enough. I think the bot got this one wrong. The URL mentioned above is down but looking at it form Google's cache, I dont see a problem here. The article is in desperate need of some references however. RadioFan (talk) 01:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 18:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The region is notable. A Google search reveals many things about this place, but I cannot find any reliable English sources and I do not know Portuguese. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.