Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingenia Communications Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to SchoolNet as an WP:ATD. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:15, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ingenia Communications Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable business. Current sourcing falls short. 1 is a passing mention (that does not verify the claim made). 5 doesn't mention them. The others are solely from local media. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to SchoolNet. Notability of this former company is largely inherited from this product. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I cleaned up the references and added (an insignificant) one. Seems notable enough, there's some detailed in-depth stuff. Nfitz (talk) 06:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete there is not enough coverage. Jaxarnolds (talk) 09:48, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: An article about a company, mentioning a project on which they worked, awards to an individual associated with the company, and the sequence of subsequent takeovers, whose final destination under Bell Canada is too remote to serve as a redirect. No convincing evidence that the company attained notability during its lifespan. The suggested redirect to SchoolNet may be an option, though the company has only a passing mention there. AllyD (talk) 08:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. I have been unable to find any references that meet NCORP criteria, topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:46, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to SchoolNet per Turtle earlier. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 22:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.