Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indiana Invaders Soccer Complex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Indiana Invaders. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 03:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana Invaders Soccer Complex

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local South Bend soccer complex doesn't demonstrate notability, with limited coverage outside routine listings and passing mentions. Hosted some PDL (amateur) games a decade ago which makes little difference. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Indiana Invaders, as the complex doesn't pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Indiana Invaders as above. Giant Snowman 12:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above, the complex is in no way independently notable. Star Mississippi 23:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect – as per all above. Fun fact, I've actually played quite a few games at this complex (including my lone shutout as a goalkeeper!) Therefore, I can say with first-hand experience that there is no way to fit nearly 5,000 people around any of the fields there. I'll be personally sad to see this go, but there's absolutely no reason for this article's continued existence. Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 02:51, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Indiana Invaders as above.Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Indiana Invaders as per above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:07, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Indiana Invaders as the subject has insufficient notability to warrant a standalone article, however WP:RFD applies and it would improve Wikipedia by being redirected to a main article. Such-change47 (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.