Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian cuisine ween

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted as A11. by DGG —SpacemanSpiff 11:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indian cuisine ween

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like a recipe and may be able to be put under a stub for Indian Cuisine though I have googled "Ween" in this context and have not found any references. Are personal recipes allowed for non-notable food items? Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 15:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. Unable to locate reliable sources despite trying variations on the (supposed) name. The article appears to be entirely based on original research. It's nothing more than a recipe and Wikipedia is not a cookbook or collection of recipes. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 17:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glane23 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTCOOKBOOK was not a redirect used for that policy I had seen used before. Nice to know it exists. Might like to try this spice out, but alas, not notable for inclusion on Wikipedia due to lack of reliable sources and the aforementioned NOTCOOKBOOK policy. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment let us know how it goes if you make it, perhaps if its good enough we can revisit the subject

Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 23:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOR. Ajf773 (talk) 05:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.