Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Kamboj educationists and writers
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 19:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Indian Kamboj educationists and writers
- Indian Kamboj educationists and writers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable. Kittybrewster ☎ 13:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I'm curious. Did you Google "Indian Kamboj educationists and writers"? Because then you definitely wouldn't get any hits. If you look at the article though, the people mentioned are certainly notable, and the article is sourced to a limited extent. Thus, I vote Keep. Antivenin 14:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Interesting topic!Jamiebijania (talk) 14:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Though possibly a mix w.r.t. notability, any subpopulation producing a high proportion of educators, writers, and scientists should be notable in WP, a quality we'd hope other subpopulations emulate. -MBHiii (talk) 15:51, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Listify and split the notable educationists and writers to their own articles. -Atmoz (talk) 23:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I think the confusion may stem from a misunderstanding of the role of intellectuals in keeping regional languages alive. "Educationalists" and other intellectuals who use these "minor" languages play a crucial role in keeping languages alive and promoting regional cultures. Along with mass media, they are the most important factor in doing so, and thus are quite notable. T L Miles (talk) 13:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —T L Miles (talk) 17:57, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.