Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Nurse
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 13:59, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Independent Nurse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable magazine lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK. ttonyb (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can find absolutely no independent sourcing about this small magazine. --MelanieN (talk) 16:22, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.