Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Baptist colleges (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been tagged as original research for a month now and nothing has been done - I think because nothing can be done. Although it survived its previous AfD as no consensus, two months ago, and there were some thoughtful comments, the fundamental problem of the institutions not identifying themselves collectively (at all, let alone by this label) and a complete lack of any sources whatsoever remains unaddressed. Some proposed merging it with another article which no longer exists as it, too, was deleted as unverifiable and original research. The article is an orphan, the only inbound link in main space is a redirect, which itself has no inbound links. I think this is a hangover form the bad old days of the Gastrich Wars and should be given a quiet funeral. Just zis Guy you know? 19:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom (except for the Gastrich bit, which I remain uncertain of). Melchoir 19:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete gastrichcruft ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 00:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete but lets hold a wake and skip the funeral. KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:19, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.