Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indenture (video game)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 14:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Indenture (video game)
Reliable third party references have been requested for this article since July 2006, and I think the chances are slim-to-none we'll ever see them. This is just a clone of another game by a non-notable programmer from what I can tell. I'm leaning towards delete personally for the moment, but would like to see wider discussion on this in case I'm missing something. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I just added a source, though it doesn't cover the more specific information. This game does appear to be the only one by the programmer. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 18:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is the reference reliable? It does not appear so to me, but feel free to argue the point. =) --Izno (talk) 07:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The reference here: maybe not; I was just using it as an example. G-hits don't seem to tie any other games to him that I can see. As for the one I put in the article, it appears to be an interview by a site dedicated to game culture; it's non-wiki; I think it would be reliable. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 01:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is the reference reliable? It does not appear so to me, but feel free to argue the point. =) --Izno (talk) 07:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. I think it's borderline, but no reliable sources establishing notability is a problem. If none can be found, it is reasonable that be deleted since its notability cannot be objectively established. Note that if reliable sources can be found, I think it should be a keep. Xihr (talk) 23:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.