Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inania

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. I can't even verify that this community exists. A previous PROD was removed. Sitush (talk) 08:30, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, since it's been tagged as having no references since September 2011 and a quick search doesn't reveal any possible sources. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:14, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, seems a hopeless case with no notability. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it is a misnomer to expect that all references especially to such old cultural names to be found online.I think the bar of having online refs even for old material like this is raising the bar a bit too high and this would essentially delete out important topics. Kwisha (talk) 15:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The sources don't need to be online, Kwisha, but we do require details of those sources. If you know of any offline sources, please add them to the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.