Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In the Twilight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 21:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the Twilight

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear notable, tagged in March 2023. Nothing found in a BEFORE.

PROD removed with "deprod; probably notable" DonaldD23 talk to me 11:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. DonaldD23 talk to me 11:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Moving Picture World has a 1 review (quoted on the Imdb p. by the way) on Feb 27, '15 (p. 1388, I think). On another page, the MPC also explains that "Twilight." fifth of the light series written by Marc Jones, has been released in the Mutual program by the Arnerican company for which it was produced by Thomas Ricketts. "Twilight" is more ambitious than its predecessors, "Day- light," "Firelight," "Moonlight""etc. (p. 688) So, there is probably enough to write a short page on this very film.— MY, OH, MY! 15:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the reliable sources review identified above. For a 1915 film it is hard to find any reviews, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 02:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.