Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In bed with nick and megan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Earwolf#Lifestyle programming. Sandstein 12:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In bed with nick and megan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blog fails WP:WEB. Might be relevant for personal articles. Dewritech (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Earwolf. This may be notable in the future, as it only recently launched about a month ago. I was going to say that it should be deleted, however I think that this could be merged and redirected to the main article for Earwolf, specifically the section about lifestyle programming. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Added it here. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 21:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Earwolf#Lifestyle programming: Per ReaderofthePack. With the main article containing little details, it's better to merge them to Earwolf. _SUPER ^ASTIG 05:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.